Geachte heer Bach, In de afgelopen decennia heb ik, bij het bestuderen en bewerken van uw muziek, zoveel vragen verzameld dat ik, zou het mij vergund zijn om eens een middagje met u door te brengen, niet zou weten waar te beginnen.
Even before I entered conservatory to study the saxophone, it was clear there was one composer who stood head and shoulders above the rest: Johann Sebastian Bach. During my studies I used movements from the violin sonatas and partitas as etudes, and realized I could spend endless hours on them without getting bored – and that for someone who hated practicing. Only much later did I learn that scales and etudes are futile if one approaches them with aversion. I therefore thank my present finger technique to the fact that I listened with gusto to recordings by Bach specialists from the 1980s, and whose tone, phrasing and articulation I did my best to emulate on my own instrument.
Thanks to Calefax I met my ‘heroes of the authentic movement’ in the flesh. Frans Brüggen, the brothers Barthold and Sigiswald Kuijken, the musicologist Kees van Houten, the string players Vera Beths, Anner Bijlsma, and later, Jan-Willem de Vriend. They were all happy to coach us on Bach, Mozart and Schubert. None one of them had (or at least expressed) misgivings about us performing ‘their’ music on modern instruments, not even the saxophone.
Meanwhile I had found another way to delve into Bach, namely by arranging his music for our quintet. Arranging begins with a thorough study of the notes and the construction of the musical material as well as an awareness of the circumstances surrounding the music’s origins, so I read books on Bach and his time, and musicological accounts of those of his works I was tackling. Soon enough I caught on that Bach’s music did not just appear out of thin air. If I were to understand his work on a deeper level, I would have to bone up on the era that preceded him, the seventeenth century, and then on the eras before that. Calefax, as usual, kept its end up, and from the very beginning we had the music of De Machaut, Josquin, Ockeghem, Byrd, Gesualdo, Monteverdi and a smattering of more obscure composers on our music stands. With each new work to be rehearsed, we read about it, listened to recordings of respected performers and tapped the knowledge of specialized teachers.
One of them was Paul Van Nevel, who enthusiastically invited us to participate in concerts given by his Huelgas Ensemble at several early music festivals, such as in Saintes and at the Festival of Flanders. There I stood with my saxophone, a piece of musical farm machinery, amid the pommers, zinks and theorbos. We had a similar experience at the Early Music Festival Utrecht, where the artistic director Jan Nuchelmans (Calefax fan from day one) managed to smuggle us onto the programme. Of course it goes without saying that there are countless musicians whose Bach and early music expertise far exceeds my own, but as a saxophonist I feel quite privileged to be in such company.
Bach was a permanent feature of my music stand. As a good start to the day, to explore the finesses of articulation, to practice playing long phrases – even during the time I was immersed in the Paganini caprices, which eventually led to the CD Paganini Caprices for Saxophone (MDG 619 1379-2) and the accompanying printed music (Schott EN 20559). For years Calefax had often played Die Kunst der Fuge, and even more often the Goldberg Variations, excerpts from Das Wohltemperierte Klavier and Das Musikalisches Opfer, a few organ works and the Vom Himmel hoch variations. The Paganini experience had honed my proficiency in arranging violin music for saxophone, as well as bolstering a sense of security in what long used to be a rather unsure finger technique.
In 2012 I recorded, purely for personal use, all the Bach solo arrangements I had made up until then, including the first four movements of the second partita. After listening to them I realized that my self-imposed decree to keep my hands off the chaconne from that partita, suddenly no longer seemed etched in stone. So I took a stab at producing a convincing version of it. Following my Paganini formula, I first made an ‘analytical’ version: one that would do justice to the construction of the music, disregarding all thoughts of what might be fun to play. An important step, because otherwise you end up taking the instrumental route too soon. Bach’s music is implicitly polyphonic: a melody usually contains more than one voice, played in turn and together forming the melodic curve as a whole. The register and relationship between the voices largely determine the buildup of tension in the music. This applies to nearly all of Bach’s music, but in the violin works he often uses multiple strings simultaneously to explicitly underscore the polyphony. So first I had to find a credible solution for the issue of polyphony. After that the other me would get his chance: the saxophone player who had free rein to determine what sounded good and, perhaps more importantly, where the advantages of the saxophone over the violin (arpeggios, for instance, are easier to play on the saxophone) could be put to good use. In this inner collaboration, the analyst constantly had the upper hand, for we were talking about a meticulously-constructed work by the greatest musical architect ever.
The resulting version satisfied both my identities: the analyst and the instrumentalist. With a sense of liberation I set to work on the remaining movements of the partitas, which went with hardly a hitch. Of course, now – nearly a year after completing the work – not one of the nineteen movements is the same. This is one of the great benefits of arranging for your own instrument: you are free to tinker with the notes whenever and however it suits you.
It’s inevitable that while preparing a recording like this one occasionally gets cold feet. Building castles in the air is one hazard of working in the security and solitude of the practice studio. To combat this I took a number of lessons from the Baroque violinist Lucy van Dael, who has herself issued a stunning recording of all the Bach solo violin works. Her tips and corrections were invaluable to the end result and also confirmed to me that my saxophone version could hold its own. My gratitude to Lucy is great!
I still revel in the privilege of touring with Calefax. Shortly before making this recording we played two concerts at the Thüringer Bachwochen, the Bach mecca par excellence. We played my arrangement of the Goldberg variations in the Nikolaikirche in Bach’s birthplace Eisenach. I stayed there with my family, strolled about town soaking up the Bach atmosphere, visited the Wartburg castle, hiked for four days in Bach’s Thüringer Wald, spoke to (former) East Germans and ate Bach’s food (or its modern-day variant). Thanks to Calefax I feel closer to Bach than ever.
(translation: Jonathan Reeder)
Geachte heer Bach, In de afgelopen decennia heb ik, bij het bestuderen en bewerken van uw muziek, zoveel vragen verzameld dat ik, zou het mij vergund zijn om eens een middagje met u door te brengen, niet zou weten waar te beginnen.
Notes are not tones. My philosophy about tones is that no notation is ever sufficient to describe a tone.
In 2020 werd ik door Kiki Raposo-de Haas, voormalig manager van Calefax, genomineerd voor de Akademie van Kunsten, de kunstpoot van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.
I only started teaching when I was 47, following a request by the Royal Conservatoire The Hague. Until then, I had always considered myself too young to teach.
Leven is nutteloos. Het kan verrassend leuk zijn, maar niemand verplicht je ertoe: je kunt het ook niet doen. Hetzelfde geldt voor kunst.
In 2007 zag ik voor het eerst Pixar’s animatiefilm Ratatouille, waarin de Parijse rat Remy er in slaagt om de keuken van een bekroond restaurant over te nemen en succesvol te runnen.
In Calefax wordt veel gediscussieerd. Dat begon al toen we nog maar net op het conservatorium zaten, als gymnasiastenclubje dat zich eigenlijk te goed voelde voor de Hbo-opleiding.
The path to this recording was long, windy and fascinating. It started with the awareness that the cello suites provide exceptional playing material for saxophonists.
De weg naar deze opname was lang, bochtig en interessant. Het begon vanuit het besef dat de suites zulk subliem speelmateriaal vormen voor saxofonisten.
I see an arrangement as a new conception of an older musical idea. Staying true to the original musical message with new instrumental means it should give way to new aspects of the composition.
Ergens in het najaar van 1997 stond ik te plassen in een urinoir. Naast me stond Frans Brüggen te plassen, in een ander urinoir.
Even before I entered conservatory, it was clear there was one composer who stood head and shoulders above the rest: Johann Sebastian Bach.
Nog voordat ik naar het conservatorium werd het mij duidelijk dat er één componist was die boven alle andere verheven was: Johann Sebastian Bach.
De bizarre vermenging van zo’n hyperformeel staatsbezoek met het toch altijd wat slordige Azië, raar hoor.
Calefax beziet de muziekgeschiedenis als het smoelenboek van de grote sociëteit der componisten.
Paganini Plus is the follow-up of Paganini Caprices for Saxophone. This new collection I gathered and arranged in the last few years for performances with Hans Eijsackers.
Paganini Plus is de opvolger van Paganini Caprices voor saxofoon. Deze nieuwe collectie heb ik de afgelopen jaren verzameld en gearrangeerd voor optredens met Hans Eijsackers.
China kan alleen nog maar meevallen. De afgelopen maand heb ik zeker zes boeken gelezen over het land. Het beeld was niet positief.
The nineteenth century not only marks the birth of the saxophone, it also ushered in the unique phenomenon of the virtuoso-composer.
De negentiende eeuw bracht niet alleen de geboorte van de saxofoon, maar ook een nieuw fenomeen: de virtuoos-componist.
Why is it that singing is generally considered more personal than instrumental playing?